Let's assume you have a serious disease and your doctor has recommended more serious therapy. Stronger medications.
You don't really like the idea of more medications but you know you don't really have that much of a choice given your disease is not controlled well enough.
The options/choices in front of you (and you haven't had experience of any):
Let's assume that all of these different medications have been shown in high grade scientific trials to be effective in roughly the same percentage of patients to roughly the same degree. I'll even tell you that at this stage, there are no definitive head-to-head comparisons to help you make up your mind which one is superior.
To make it even easier or harder (depending on your perspective), let's say that the side effect profiles are all a little different between the agents but in terms of serious (and this is open to interpretation) side effects, there is little difference.
Importantly, the cost of each option is also roughly the same.
Which would you choose?
Intravenous, Subcutaneous or Oral?
And why?